Discussion in 'Bedlam & Flame' started by OU7NCS, Jul 1, 2010.
Hey, sometimes its the little, insignificant things that matter.
Ha ha ha, "pussies".
Simple facts: 27 -0.
I can't do this all day so just assume after you post I reply with:
"Fact is ou was fourth in the big 12 south - what a bunch of pussies."
Thanks in advance.
I guess it's eaiser to laugh, than to accept simple facts. 27-0
That you're still a pussy? Apparently not. Gotta go, I have a life outside posting to pussies. Bwaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha, still funny.
Sure, it doen't hurt. On second thought, I'm sure not going to a BCS game hurts, but OSWho is so used to losing to OU in football it probably doesn't hurt.
Happy to help!
Kind of like when you practice something, you get good at it?
You have "a life outside posting to pussies", what do you say to them?
Let me guess, We might have lost 27-0 to those OU pussies, but we finished 2nd in the Big 12 South.
wow, it CAN learn!
So OU was the better team that day but OSU was the better team overall...right.
I think its more percepion than reallity. Everyone knew this was not the best OU team Stoops has had. But OU really had only 2 bad games, Texas Tech and Neb. With all the pre-season hipe OSU had, like the S.I. cover, and with the win over Georgia, everyone was thinking Big 12 title game and a BCS bowl. Everyone only remembers the last regular season game and the bowl game. Overall OU got better as the season went on, and OSU went downhill the last 3 games.
Also the fact that the reason our season was so hyped. Dez Bryant and Kendall Hunter. Where did they go? We lose our best players and yet pull out of it with a better record. You lose Sam and JG and go to the Sun Bowl.
That what I was saying, its more percepion than reallity. 9-4 is a great record. 2nd in the Big 12 South is great. Going to the Cotton Bowl is great. But OSU fell on their face the last 2 games on national TV, and thats what people remember.
Would you also agree the reason why we didn't do well is because our QB was not at 100%? More like, 70%.
Yes I do agree with that. I guess you would also agree that our QB was not 100% either? More like 0%
Uh, no. OU was the better team overall. 27-0, no 2nd half first downs, no crossing the 50 yard line. If it would have ben 17-13 or 20-10, yeah you could maybe say OSWho had the better overall team, just not on that day.
So you would agree that since Texas beat OU in 2008 they were the better team and deserved to play in the national championship against Florida. That in fact, choosing OU was a mockery, egregious, and outrageous because they lost head to head against Texas.
Separate names with a comma.