No it’s really not, I might disagree with a law I might consider the law or regulation as overreach but if they enforce a law on the books that’s what they’re supposed to do.
To combat that we have to elect officials who will remove bad laws and gvt overreach from the books, iow, don’t like the law work to change it.
Adding laws to create more enforcement to an existing law (gun control aae) is different.
full disclosure, I support the memorializing of this rule
To combat that we have to elect officials who will remove bad laws and gvt overreach from the books, iow, don’t like the law work to change it.
Adding laws to create more enforcement to an existing law (gun control aae) is different.
full disclosure, I support the memorializing of this rule
.........
It has been policy for many years to exclude this law from military/gov service. Instead of screwing a few servicemen over, they could have continued the policy that was not causing harm and got a servicemember friendly congressman to sponsor an change.
There are thousands of federal laws that are not enforced to the letter. Look at cannabis. Federally illegal yet a multi-billion dollar legal industry. When Sessions was going to "enforce the law" on that he was hogtied. But, this one only harms a few servicemen so lets get noble and enforce the laws.