Tweet of the Day

  • You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.

jetman

Federal Marshal
Nov 27, 2004
12,757
8,665
1,743
Edmond Oklahoma
Oh, that's right, it makes absolutely no difference how cavalier or uninformed the leader of the free world may be its just a new normal.
It's been established that Greenland is flush with natural resources so it was seen as investment. You do know how investments work, right? You spend money to make money. Also, the part about Trump not being the 1st president to talk about buying Greenland.
 

Pokey

Territorial Marshal
Sep 13, 2013
5,293
1,178
743
Left field
It's been established that Greenland is flush with natural resources so it was seen as investment. You do know how investments work, right? You spend money to make money. Also, the part about Trump not being the 1st president to talk about buying Greenland.
Yep, but also have never believed that the US should be building an empire. But hey, the Louisiana and Alaska purchase worked out.
 

Binman4OSU

Legendary Cowboy
Aug 31, 2007
29,198
15,764
1,743
Stupid about AGW!!
Yeah..what he is referring to is a crack pot psychologist who claims Google searches showed Hillary's name more than Trump in 2016 thus causing more people to subconsciously vote for Hillary because they saw her name more on Google searches

He is literally claiming 2-16 million more people went to a voting booth and voted for Clinton vs Trump because they saw Clinton's name more on Google searches ......he made this claim in 2016 and has even testified in Washington DC about his claims and his methods and claims were dismissed as psuedo science and non scientific methods ...but here our POTUS is bringing it up as if it was real to take a shot at Google
 

Deere Poke

I'd rather be in the woods
A/V Subscriber
Feb 13, 2014
11,065
9,847
743
52
Bixby-Bristow OK
Yeah..what he is referring to is a crack pot psychologist who claims Google searches showed Hillary's name more than Trump in 2016 thus causing more people to subconsciously vote for Hillary because they saw her name more on Google searches

He is literally claiming 2-16 million more people went to a voting booth and voted for Clinton vs Trump because they saw Clinton's name more on Google searches ......he made this claim in 2016 and has even testified in Washington DC about his claims and his methods and claims were dismissed as psuedo science and non scientific methods ...but here our POTUS is bringing it up as if it was real to take a shot at Google
missing_the_point.png