Wuhan Coronavirus

  • You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.

wrenhal

Territorial Marshal
Aug 11, 2011
9,589
4,180
743
50
So possibly not reinfected, but virus goes dormant, and host tests negative and then the same virus reactivates itself ??!!!

I left out that possibility, like measles to shingles, reactivation and second disease. In which case we're smurfed.
Isn't that chicken pox to shingles? And that usually happens with a period of time between, not within days or even weeks right?

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
 

Binman4OSU

Legendary Cowboy
Aug 31, 2007
32,008
16,208
1,743
Stupid about AGW!!
Tough news. The lady we know who was put in ICU last week after testing positive will be taken off life support tonight. She was placed in a medically induced coma 3 days ago but her lungs and kidneys have failed.

She was in her early 60s with health issues and lived in a long term care facility in Tulsa where they suspect others were exposed. Please do the right thing for the high risk and vulnerable in our communities
 

RxCowboy

Has no Rx for his orange obsession.
A/V Subscriber
Nov 8, 2004
74,684
52,247
1,743
Wishing I was in Stillwater
Jul 22, 2011
2,179
2,594
743
Here is an update on that story.

The part that the virus can lay dormant in the body and then later attack the lungs is pretty horrifying

And the idea of a false positive based on residual traces of the original infection are good to know and good news

https://thehill.com/policy/healthca...-testing-positive-again-after-recovery-report
Any follow up on these positive re-test cases? Didn't see any links or updates from that Hill story and haven't seen any follow ups elsewhere. It would be very informative to know what portion of the 51 positive retests from SK had died or completely recovered.
 
Sep 18, 2006
1,136
1,489
1,743
SEC country :(
https://www.foxnews.com/health/coro...wastewater-at-levels-far-higher-than-expected

Coronavirus was detected in Massachusetts sewage at higher levels than expected, suggesting there are many more undiagnosed patients than previously known, according to a new study.

Researchers from biotech startup Biobot Analytics collected samples from a wastewater facility for an unnamed metropolitan area in late March, according to a report Tuesday on medRxiv.

Eric Alm, one of the authors of the study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, stressed that the public is not at risk of contracting the virus from particles in the wastewater, but they may have the potential to indicate how widespread the virus has become, Newsweek reported.

“Even if those viral particles are no longer active or capable of infecting humans, they may still carry genetic material that can be detected using an approach called PCR (polymerase chain reaction,) which amplifies the genetic signal many orders of magnitude creating billions of copies of the genome for each starting virus,” Alm told the outlet.

The researchers, along with a team from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard, and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, analyzed the samples and found the number of coronavirus particles was on par with if there were 2,300 people infected with the virus.

But at the time of tests, there were only 446 confirmed cases in the region, according to the study.

____________________________

For the uninformed like me, does the CDC use sampling such as this to come up with an estimate for how many people are truly infected with a particular virus/disease?
 

Binman4OSU

Legendary Cowboy
Aug 31, 2007
32,008
16,208
1,743
Stupid about AGW!!
https://www.foxnews.com/health/coro...wastewater-at-levels-far-higher-than-expected

Coronavirus was detected in Massachusetts sewage at higher levels than expected, suggesting there are many more undiagnosed patients than previously known, according to a new study.

Researchers from biotech startup Biobot Analytics collected samples from a wastewater facility for an unnamed metropolitan area in late March, according to a report Tuesday on medRxiv.

Eric Alm, one of the authors of the study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, stressed that the public is not at risk of contracting the virus from particles in the wastewater, but they may have the potential to indicate how widespread the virus has become, Newsweek reported.

“Even if those viral particles are no longer active or capable of infecting humans, they may still carry genetic material that can be detected using an approach called PCR (polymerase chain reaction,) which amplifies the genetic signal many orders of magnitude creating billions of copies of the genome for each starting virus,” Alm told the outlet.

The researchers, along with a team from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard, and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, analyzed the samples and found the number of coronavirus particles was on par with if there were 2,300 people infected with the virus.

But at the time of tests, there were only 446 confirmed cases in the region, according to the study.
____________________________

For the uninformed like me, does the CDC use sampling such as this to come up with an estimate for how many people are truly infected with a particular virus/disease?
Which is why things like this make the following VERY risky
1586524727248.png
 

RxCowboy

Has no Rx for his orange obsession.
A/V Subscriber
Nov 8, 2004
74,684
52,247
1,743
Wishing I was in Stillwater
Any follow up on these positive re-test cases? Didn't see any links or updates from that Hill story and haven't seen any follow ups elsewhere. It would be very informative to know what portion of the 51 positive retests from SK had died or completely recovered.
I just talked with an infectious disease doc a few minutes ago. He doesn't think it is reinfection or reactivation. He thinks there were problems with the older tests.
 
Jul 25, 2018
3,228
967
243
49
Boulder, CO
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...uhan-china-in-november/ar-BB12paJf?li=BBnb7Kz

"Even after public health authorities began sounding the alarm in January, the U.S. took few steps to ready itself for a pandemic. There was no effort to boost national stockpiles of medical equipment or encourage social distancing, for example. While Trump touts his decision to stop flights from China coming to the U.S. on Jan. 31, about 381,000 people had flown from China to the U.S. in January, according to an analysis by the New York Times.

Initially, the World Health Organization was conservative. In a statement about the disease on Jan. 14 — about the first case outside of China, in Thailand — the WHO said, "there is no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission."