Democrats and Never Trumpers will put Trump back in the White House in 2020

  • You are viewing Orangepower as a Guest. To start new threads, reply to posts, or participate in polls or contests - you must register. Registration is free and easy. Click Here to register.

Cimarron

It's not dying I'm talking about, it's living.
Jun 28, 2007
52,556
18,181
1,743
#1
A good read for everyone. You may disagree but some good points are mentioned.

And for those of you who think we have a Russian agent in the White House? You may be right, you've just got the wrong guy.

In fact, President Trump has been much tougher on Russia than President Obama ever dreamed of being. From sanctions to the military buildup of NATO, to rebuilding missile defenses and forward positioning in the Balkans, to offensive weapons for Ukraine, the president has been tougher, not softer. Yet, the left’s innuendos and attacks continue to paint Trump, as The New York Times hysterically put it, as a potential Russian agent.




Democrats and Never Trumpers will put Trump back in the White House in 2020 -- Here's why



As you listen to the liberal media, the Never Trumpers and the left-wing Trump haters chatter on about President Trump’s current situation, remember these two numbers — 35 and 49.

The first number was President Ronald Reagan’s approval in January 1983.

The second number was the number of states Reagan carried 22 months later.

I am not predicting President Trump will carry 49 states. This is a different environment, and the tribalism that divides the country is deeper than it was 36 years ago.

However, in contrast to the enthusiastic doomsayers on television, I am willing to predict President Trump will recover. Also, he is much more likely to be re-elected than any of his opponents at The New York Times, The Washington Post, or the liberal networks currently believe.

President Trump’s resilience, despite two straight years of the most negative media coverage of any president since Lincoln (at least 90 percent negative according to studies by the Media Research Center that analyzed nightly broadcasts) is a sign that he has a devoted base that will stick with him. The most recent unemployment applications are the lowest since November 1969 (when there were a lot fewer Americans at work). There are powerful initiatives underway to continue to increase American jobs and economic growth.

The left will do for Trump what it did for President Reagan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and what it is currently doing for Prime Minister Theresa May (who is surviving because the alternative is so terrible). A few more proposals for 70 percent tax rates, sanctuary states, tax paid health care for everyone including illegal immigrants, open borders, anti-Semitism, and anti-Israeli hostility, and the Democrats will begin driving away everyone but the hard left. California Governor Gavin Newsom’s wildly left-wing ideas are going to be a striking contrast to President Trump’s comparatively mainstream views (Newsom was mayor of San Francisco and is carrying its leftist ideology to the entire state). New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez may set a new standard for willful ignorance by a non-Hollywood personality. There is a point where smiling while saying things that are factually false simply doesn’t sustain a national movement.

The energy in the Democratic Party is entirely on the left, and as Hillary Clinton discovered, the nominating process is going to drive the Democratic candidates to get as nutty as necessary to please the new generation of radical bigots.

The media’s new enthusiasm for third-party billionaires (Starbucks anyone?) is a big help to Trump’s re-election. Any third-party candidate will divide the anti-Trump vote and have no effect on the pro-Trump vote. The White House should encourage every would-be third-party leader. The more the merrier from the Trump perspective.

The Never Trump Republicans will get a lot of media and will be socially celebrated by the Washington, New York, and Hollywood crowds. They will do Sunday shows, be invited to speak at establishment events, and have paid staff egging them on (so they can continue to get paid). The Never Trump candidates will also be crushed by President Trump in Republican primaries.

Trump, like Reagan, learns and thinks a lot more than his detractors acknowledge.

He is accomplishing far more around the world than anyone thought possible (note the head of NATO just said Trump had gotten the alliance to add $100 billion toward defense and commended Trump’s tactics to contain Russia). The Chinese are losing the trade fight, and they know it. NAFTA has been renegotiated. Kim Jong Un has marginally changed his behavior in the right direction. Trump has a remarkable number of personal relations with heads of government and communicates with them by telephone as often as any president in history.

Mueller and the anti-Trump Deep State will continue to be annoying, and their news media manipulation will keep the left enthralled. Need to lock an American up in isolation for 23 hours a day while awaiting trial? That is what Mueller has done to Paul Manafort. Need to ensure TV coverage of a fully armed dawn FBI raid? Just invite CNN along as Mueller did last week at Roger Stone’s house. Mueller will continue to use armed force in the middle of the night against non-violent Americans who have indicated they would cooperate.

And yet, as Andy McCarthy wrote after the Stone indictments, none of this proves anything about Trump and Russia, which was the original story.

In fact, President Trump has been much tougher on Russia than President Obama ever dreamed of being. From sanctions to the military buildup of NATO, to rebuilding missile defenses and forward positioning in the Balkans, to offensive weapons for Ukraine, the president has been tougher, not softer. Yet, the left’s innuendos and attacks continue to paint Trump, as The New York Times hysterically put it, as a potential Russian agent.

The Mueller investigation will eventually be put in perspective and will lead to serious reforms to limit the threat of an out-of-control deep state in the Justice Department.

The American people will gradually realize that this whole effort has been a political hoax to smear the president, which has weakened the country and undermined the rule of law.

The hard left will go into the summer of 2020 chanting hatred and believing everything bad about Trump. They will represent about 40 percent of the country. The hardcore Trump supporters will go into the summer of 2020 amazed at how much their leader has achieved despite unending news media, Democratic hostility, and splits in the GOP. They will make up 45 percent of the country.

The 15 percent who will have been repelled by the left’s craziness and turned off by President Trump’s style will enter the summer of 2020 wishing they had a better choice. In the end, they will have to gamble on the least dangerous and least bad future. When that happened in 2016, they broke overwhelmingly for Trump over Clinton, and the late deciders made him president.

There will be three big things helping Trump in 2020:

1. The Trump administration’s accomplishments will be real (a future column will outline the wave of breakthroughs in our lives that will start being felt in the next 18 months).

2. The hysteria and dishonesty of the investigations and their irrelevancy in terms of Trump as president will be obvious, and only the left will pay them any attention.

3. Breakthroughs like criminal justice reform, a cure for sickle cell disease, better education through parental choice, the best African American employment rate in history, and the like will lead to Republican breakthroughs with minorities (as happened surprisingly in both Florida and Georgia against Democratic African American candidates for governor – in both states the margin of victory was African Americans voting Republican).

Over the next few weeks, as you listen to the anti-Trumpers relish the winter of discontent and pronounce the end of the Trump presidency, just remember — they were wrong in 2015 when they said he couldn’t be a serious candidate; they were wrong in the spring of 2016 when they said he couldn’t win the GOP nomination; they were wrong in 2018 when they said he should withdraw Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination.

Why should you believe them now?

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/new...ump-back-in-the-white-house-in-2020-heres-why
 

Rack

Legendary Cowboy
Oct 13, 2004
20,243
9,128
1,743
Earth
#2
Good read, but as a 15%er from the article...I think I'm much more like a 50%er, and i think that most in the country fall in that category...despite what the media and the coast would want us to believe. The reason I think this is that 1.) MOST people don't like Trumps rhetoric or his past behavior. 2.) MOST people love lower taxes and a higher stock market. 3.) MOST people don't like Trumps mannerisms or apparent negative focusing speech patters. 4.) MOST people like to see results.

for the 15/50% the question remains..Is he a wolf (rhetoric) in sheeps (policy) clothing...or a sheep (policy) in wolves (rhetoric) clothing? Once we find out, we will know if we can stand another 4 years and will vote accordingly.
 

NotOnTV

BRB -- Taking an okie leak
Sep 14, 2010
8,681
6,443
743
Gondor
#3
Dems made a yuge mistake. Both Bernie and Hillary were unelectable, but Kamala Harris is precisely following the Obama trajectory. I believe she will be elected in 2020.
 
Jul 20, 2018
585
165
43
Oklahoma City
#4
Dems made a yuge mistake. Both Bernie and Hillary were unelectable, but Kamala Harris is precisely following the Obama trajectory. I believe she will be elected in 2020.
Many polls have Kamala as the top contender right now. The same spot Scott Walker once enjoyed at about the same time in the last cycle. It's the kiss of death for a Presidential hopeful.
 

Rack

Legendary Cowboy
Oct 13, 2004
20,243
9,128
1,743
Earth
#5
Dems made a yuge mistake. Both Bernie and Hillary were unelectable, but Kamala Harris is precisely following the Obama trajectory. I believe she will be elected in 2020.
No way...she's WAY more liberal and socialist than Obama was in practice or in running for President. I don't see her being nominated. Could be wrong, but identity politics on the left isn't a winner long-term...it wasn't with HRC and it won't be with Kamala....IMHO you are believing the media's bent on the public perception at large and it (the public opinion), THANK GOD, doesn't fit into that bent. It's like they are trying to fit a square peg candidates (ultra left-wing liberal mindset) into a round hole (centrist middle mindset) public. IMHO, the Starbucks guy has a MUCH better opportunity than does a socialist envy-based politician.
 

NotOnTV

BRB -- Taking an okie leak
Sep 14, 2010
8,681
6,443
743
Gondor
#6
No way...she's WAY more liberal and socialist than Obama was in practice or in running for President. I don't see her being nominated. Could be wrong, but identity politics on the left isn't a winner long-term...it wasn't with HRC and it won't be with Kamala....IMHO you are believing the media's bent on the public perception at large and it (the public opinion), THANK GOD, doesn't fit into that bent. It's like they are trying to fit a square peg candidates (ultra left-wing liberal mindset) into a round hole (centrist middle mindset) public. IMHO, the Starbucks guy has a MUCH better opportunity than does a socialist envy-based politician.
I hope you are correct, @Rack .
 

Cimarron

It's not dying I'm talking about, it's living.
Jun 28, 2007
52,556
18,181
1,743
#7
One thing I would caution everyone about. Don’t believe the media when they tell you who the front runners are. Most of them are either stupid or they’re lying to you.
 
Nov 6, 2010
1,059
404
713
#9
Trump just makes so many enemies and offends so many people, his margin for error is going to be razor thin. We can analyze all the different angles, but if the economy keeps humming along like it is, he has a good chance. If not, then I think he gets beat in a landslide, regardless of who the dems nominate.
 
Jul 20, 2018
585
165
43
Oklahoma City
#10
Trump just makes so many enemies and offends so many people, his margin for error is going to be razor thin. We can analyze all the different angles, but if the economy keeps humming along like it is, he has a good chance. If not, then I think he gets beat in a landslide, regardless of who the dems nominate.
There's one other option........... I agree Trump has a "good chance" at winning again, hell he'll be the incumbent. But if the economy tanks really hard, Trump might not even win the nomination.
 
Nov 6, 2010
1,059
404
713
#11
There's one other option........... I agree Trump has a "good chance" at winning again, hell he'll be the incumbent. But if the economy tanks really hard, Trump might not even win the nomination.
The republican party is completely under Trump's control now, and even if the economy tanks, which I think is doubtful, there is no way anyone will challenge him, it would be political suicide. They will simply wait it out and run in 2024.
 
Jul 20, 2018
585
165
43
Oklahoma City
#12
The republican party is completely under Trump's control now, and even if the economy tanks, which I think is doubtful, there is no way anyone will challenge him, it would be political suicide. They will simply wait it out and run in 2024.
I just won't discount somebody challenging Trump in the primaries or maybe go Independent or something.

We'll see.
 

CocoCincinnati

Federal Marshal
Feb 7, 2007
17,426
24,369
1,743
Tulsa, OK
#13
The republican party is completely under Trump's control now, and even if the economy tanks, which I think is doubtful, there is no way anyone will challenge him, it would be political suicide. They will simply wait it out and run in 2024.
I think you're partly right. There are enough hard core Trump supporters that it would certainly be a huge career risk to challenge him (unless something changes and it might). But don't mistake resigned acceptance as complete control. I accept Trump for now because of the SCOTUS choices and cutting regulations but I still don't like him....I would certainly support someone like Paul or just about any other true conservative or Libertarian over him but don't want a Ryan or a Bush.
Heck if the Dems would just nominate someone like Webb or even Lieberman, it would at least be a tough choice, but I don't think the Dems are going to make it that hard on me.....they'll nominate an extremely far lefty and make Trump the easy choice, despite his many flaws, for many moderates and conservatives alike.
 
Jul 20, 2018
1,547
239
193
77539
#14
I think you're partly right. There are enough hard core Trump supporters that it would certainly be a huge career risk to challenge him (unless something changes and it might). But don't mistake resigned acceptance as complete control. I accept Trump for now because of the SCOTUS choices and cutting regulations but I still don't like him....I would certainly support someone like Paul or just about any other true conservative or Libertarian over him but don't want a Ryan or a Bush.
Heck if the Dems would just nominate someone like Webb or even Lieberman, it would at least be a tough choice, but I don't think the Dems are going to make it that hard on me.....they'll nominate an extremely far lefty and make Trump the easy choice, despite his many flaws, for many moderates and conservatives alike.
Paul doesn't have a chance. He's weak. No one wants a weak leader.