I get that you're saying the ISU offensive failures against OSU's defense made ISU's D look bad. But you have to give credit to the OSU D, then, for having an effect on offense (which I wasn't even considering before). FYI, OSU had 2, not 3 fourth down stops. And both stops were fairly well into OSU's side of the field.
Also, I take back what I said earlier. OSU scored a defensive TD against Texas, so Texas' D only allowed 25 points. KSU's D only allowed 24 due to a defensive TD. Tulsa allowed a kickoff return TD, so their D actually allowed 21 points. And I didn't even mention Boise State, whose D allowed 21 points.
So in summary, ISU's D allowed the same amount of (effective) points as Baylor, Texas, Kansas State, and Missouri State, almost down to the point...and allowed more points than Boise St. and Tulsa. One can hold out hope that the upcoming Kansas D will put on a worse showing than ISU did, though.
Giving up that last TD drive was the worst moment of the season for the OSU defense, though. And, yes, it did surprise me.
Also, I take back what I said earlier. OSU scored a defensive TD against Texas, so Texas' D only allowed 25 points. KSU's D only allowed 24 due to a defensive TD. Tulsa allowed a kickoff return TD, so their D actually allowed 21 points. And I didn't even mention Boise State, whose D allowed 21 points.
So in summary, ISU's D allowed the same amount of (effective) points as Baylor, Texas, Kansas State, and Missouri State, almost down to the point...and allowed more points than Boise St. and Tulsa. One can hold out hope that the upcoming Kansas D will put on a worse showing than ISU did, though.
Giving up that last TD drive was the worst moment of the season for the OSU defense, though. And, yes, it did surprise me.
-
1
- Show all