This is something I've noticed here and other places and I'm curious to get people's opinions. I'm not going to argue or discuss and I won't even respond after the initial post, I'm just trying to understand where people are coming from. A&M seems to have been heavily criticized for their move to the SEC, accused of everything from breaching a contract to attempting to destroy the Waco economy (I admit that one makes me giggle). West Virginia, in comparison, is breaking a more recently agreed to and very similar agreement with the Big East (that many would say makes little geographic sense) yet seems to have pretty much escaped criticism from the media and fans. That does probably have somewhat to do with regional coverage, I'd think that if we were to dig into papers and websites covering that region of the country we'd see some negative coverage. So my question: is that just my perspective or do you see the positive/negative coverage of the two moves similarly? Do you share that opinion and if so or if not, why? Thanks, I'll hang up and listen.